Skip to content

A public reference institution of the State of North Carolina's law

3RD EDITION · MARCH 2028 · Published by The Blackstone Project

Access to Justice Index

A number per county for whether someone without a lawyer can get through the justice system in it — held to the same method every year.

Cite as
The Blackstone Project at North Carolina Law, Access to Justice Index (3d ed. 2028)
Formats
web · pdf · csv
all free, all citable
The Blackstone Project
Studies in the Law of North Carolina
An imprint of North Carolina Law
6
Counties covered in this edition
1 of 6
Counties with no full-time local legal aid office
66%
Average share of civil defendants (eviction + small claims) appearing without counsel
5 of 6
Counties with an improved score since the 2nd edition, under the restated method

The 3rd edition broadens the pro se measure from eviction cases alone to the combined eviction and small-claims debt-collection docket — the debt-collection docket runs a higher self-represented rate than eviction, and a measure scoped to eviction alone was undercounting who actually goes through court without a lawyer. The Blackstone Research Council reviewed the change before this edition's method was frozen, 2027-09-01. Coverage stays at the same six counties as the 2nd edition, so what moves below is the method, not the map — both this edition's figures and the change from the 2nd edition are computed under the new method, and the 2nd edition is restated under it below rather than left standing beside a number that method wouldn't have produced.

County data

CountyLocal aid officesPro se (eviction + small claims)Change
Buncombe161%-3pt
Cumberland165%-3pt
Dare076%unchanged
Mecklenburg160%-2pt
Swain171%-4pt
Wake164%-2pt

Restated under this edition’s method

Method changed this edition
Scope broadened from eviction cases alone to the combined eviction and small-claims debt-collection docket. The 2nd edition's own published page is left exactly as it was issued; its county figures are recomputed under the new method in the table below so the comparison above is a fair one.
CountyAs published (2nd edition)Restated (3rd edition method)
Buncombe58%64%
Cumberland63%68%
Dare72%76%
Mecklenburg55%62%
Swain69%75%
Wake58%66%
Why an index and not a report
A number per county, held to the same method every year, gives every local paper, county commission and legal aid board something to argue about. A narrative report gets read once. An index is the more useful civic object.
The rule that protects it
The method is frozen and published before data collection begins. If the method changes in a later edition, both years are restated under the new method rather than left inconsistent — a comparison across years is only honest if the ruler didn’t change.
access-to-justice-index-2028 · 3rd edition
published 2028-03-13 · method frozen 2027-09-01
sources: NC Administrative Office of the Courts · Legal Aid of North Carolina · NC State Bar
all underlying data released as csv
grew out of the Access to Justice research programme
read the 2nd edition (2027-03-15)
North Carolina Law · Public legal information
Reviewed
2028-03-13
Editor
The Blackstone Research Council
Supersedes
2nd edition (2027)